6 Comments
User's avatar
Some User Name's avatar

Good article. When I read your work, I am always amazed that you were somehow able to make it through the university PHD system with your integrity intact. I would imagine somebody with your views would have a difficult time at the university.

Andrejus Antoninovas's avatar

Yep, not much surprise. Now a question: is it possible to somehow to "force" to use "gender equality" in real sense and not to pretend? is it in JFK hands or no hope?

James L. Nuzzo's avatar

Are you asking if I think it is likely that the current U.S. administration will pay more attention to men's health issues?

Andrejus Antoninovas's avatar

Kinda. Because I am in Europe and don't have understanding US of health system, so just interesting how much system is "rig" for change, because in my country you basically have to vote for right party and then it depends what is set up as Health minister, so change is very hard.

James L. Nuzzo's avatar

Yes, in the U.S., the party that is voted into the executive branch or legislative branch will impact health policy priorities.

The Trump administration has been showing signs of a greater interest in men's health compared to the previous administration. Here is a recent White House executive order about men's health week:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/06/presidential-message-on-national-mens-health-week-2025/

Andrejus Antoninovas's avatar

Right, forget about it, let's hope for the best, because as for Trump (to think that I hate this guy when he was elected for first time, what time and ideological bs can do :D), now even Olympics basically bans trans.