Brilliant analysis James. Typical 'shills'. Their posts reflect bias but then their remit is Women. However, I little action with regard to FGM, subjugation of women in Islam nor child marriage. Instead of adopting a 'woe is us' perspective, they should DO SOMETHING. That said, they don't have a hope in hell of achieving anything as Islam regards women as 'nothing other than a slave baby making machine'. Good luck with that.
You might be interested in reading my application to the UN regarding the breach of fair trial rights in Canada. In response, Canada sent the central perpetrator in my complaint to the UN as Canada's Ambassador. There has been silence since. The central complaint is that a judge rejected the transcript provided by me and called upon the Plaintiff, a woman, for her recollection of what a judge said 8 months prior and preferred her version of the truth over the official record of the trial, to protect a lawyer committing fraud on a court order against a man. https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/united-nations
I did not see anything about women in Muslim dominated countries where the greatest atrocities occur. They are wasting their time about Western countries where women are protected. Violence against women cannot be stopped until ALL violence is stopped. Suppressing men will lead to greater resentment and violence.
This is important and impressively researched, but it represents a tiny proportion of the mischief caused by feminists at the UN. Focusing only on overt bias against men, serious as that is, presents a narrow view of the destruction.
Sex and “gender” issues are the main preoccupation of the vast bulk of UN staff, and the UN serves as a major patronage machine for feminist employment. Their obsession with “gender equality and the empowerment of women” (their ubiquitous and contradictory phrase) involves them in fueling global poverty, ensuring that underdeveloped countries stay underdeveloped, indoctrinating children into feminist ideology, creating and exacerbating the global AIDS epidemic, undermining constructive “liberation” efforts of oppressed peoples, even encouraging war, and more. I spend over a hundred pages on this in my book, The New Politics of Sex (www.StephenBaskerville.com), and I quote numerous testimonies of scholars, journalists, and practitioners who have first-hand experience battling feminists at the UN.
More UN conferences have been devoted to “women” than any other topic. These conferences and other meetings are organized by feminist organizations, who draft the final document before the conference begins. Groups disapproved by feminists are inhibited and excluded from participation. Feminist groups participate sitting around the conference table while official UN ambassadors from poor countries (upholding traditional values) must stand against the wall. They hold multiple meetings simultaneously in different languages, so that poor countries, lacking the staff and translators, cannot participate.
UN “human rights” treaties like CEDAW and the Convention on the Rights of the Child are written and enforced by feminist groups. UN “human rights” agencies constantly push to make abortion a human right, despite the contrary wishes of most member states. They also push to make domestic violence a human rights violation, which will allow or force governments to treat men accused of domestic violence like dictators, removing their due process protections.
UNICEF is especially saturated with feminism. The agency some of us remember from the 1960s, with Danny Kaye selling Easter Seals, has become the directorate of global social work and viciously anti-male.
UN “development aid” goes entirely to women, making it global welfare with all the familiar consequences: eliminating fathers, preventing family formation, and trapping poor countries in the poverty and accompanying social ills that always result from widespread single motherhood.
UN-sponsored “sex education” programs do not just instruct children in how to have sex; they also indoctrinate them into feminist ideology.
UN AIDS programs made the AIDS epidemic far worse, especially among heterosexuals in places like Africa, by undermining effective abstinence programs and pushing condoms exclusively.
UN programs against “child soldiers” have zero impact, because they are undermined by UN ideology itself, which encourages children to rebel and break free from their parents and join gangs and militias.
UN programs on “human trafficking” encourage various destructive practices and augment government power. They make prostitution a crime for the men to buy (“sex trafficking”) but legal for the women to sell (“sex workers”).
The International Criminal Court, formally linked to the UN, spends most of its time prosecuting men for alleged sexual crimes.
The UN’s most basic role – ensuring global peace – is undermined by encouraging military intervention in places like Afghanistan to promote “gender equality”.
I could go on and on, and you will find all these points and others elaborated in Part Four of my book, The New Politics of Sex (www.StephenBaskerville.com).
A free house,money, education and our health resources. Then, to bring their large extended families here too. Admittedly about 3% will make it big here. And I'll be the first to applaud them. But the remaining approx 95% will be a drain on us forever. Already the earlier batch of them are now a burden on our council tax. So we ordinary people,most of whom don't want them here,are having to pay for them!! Totally insane. They can also rely on traitorous hypocritical “ human rights” lawyers to fight hard against deportation. And crazed utopian dreamer Liberals too. So we have an enemy within to defeat as well. No wonder they see us as the world's suckers.
>“Do you know what it means to be “redpilled”? It’s the belief that society favors women over men—a view that fuels harmful gender narratives. “Red pill” narratives are central to the #manosphere and challenges progress on #GenderEquality.”
I think I can write a booklet about this UN women tweet but lets focus on 1 thing.
Lets assume I agree with this statement (It is close but absolutely no cigar) "It’s [redpilled] the belief that society favors women over men"
UN WOMEN concludes that this is "a view that fuels harmful gender narratives". (No proof though)
Now look at feminism:
Feminism fights for equal rights (for women) to men, against the patriarchy that -as to feminists- oppressed women through all of history ...
I think it is safe to conclude that: Feminism is the belief that society favors men over women
So by their own reasoning: feminism is a view that fuels harmful gender narratives. (and challenges progress on #GenderEquality)
aha. I see it now.. the not so subtle way of pushing 'females' to the front while acknowledging everyone else. I've known about it but now I see this behaviour (gaslighting??) for what it is. Interesting..
" “Everyone should feel safe at home. Yet, every day women and girls are killed by an intimate partner or someone in their own family. Governments must invest in the prevention of gender-based violence and support services for survivors.”"
so does that mean that (according to the UN) the One Male and Two Females in the following case should have the right 'to feel safe at home'??
Exceptional analysis above from James Nuzzo... Comprehensive, structured, balanced, authoritative, with clear conclusions.
"Taxpayers should not be forced to fund feminist propaganda."
Hear, hear!!
Brilliant work James and quite depressing, though my regular involvement with young professionals suggests the times they are a'changing.
I think the next 10 years will see a substantial push back.
So many reasons to expose UN Women as a hate group and disband it in this amazing article. Respect for trudging through all this sludge.
Thank you so much James.
Amazing work!
Wow! Great piece of work Jim! Many thanks.
Brilliant analysis James. Typical 'shills'. Their posts reflect bias but then their remit is Women. However, I little action with regard to FGM, subjugation of women in Islam nor child marriage. Instead of adopting a 'woe is us' perspective, they should DO SOMETHING. That said, they don't have a hope in hell of achieving anything as Islam regards women as 'nothing other than a slave baby making machine'. Good luck with that.
You might be interested in reading my application to the UN regarding the breach of fair trial rights in Canada. In response, Canada sent the central perpetrator in my complaint to the UN as Canada's Ambassador. There has been silence since. The central complaint is that a judge rejected the transcript provided by me and called upon the Plaintiff, a woman, for her recollection of what a judge said 8 months prior and preferred her version of the truth over the official record of the trial, to protect a lawyer committing fraud on a court order against a man. https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/united-nations
Comes up on my X feed frequently… I’m not overly friendly in my response 😉
I did not see anything about women in Muslim dominated countries where the greatest atrocities occur. They are wasting their time about Western countries where women are protected. Violence against women cannot be stopped until ALL violence is stopped. Suppressing men will lead to greater resentment and violence.
Excellent work
This is important and impressively researched, but it represents a tiny proportion of the mischief caused by feminists at the UN. Focusing only on overt bias against men, serious as that is, presents a narrow view of the destruction.
Sex and “gender” issues are the main preoccupation of the vast bulk of UN staff, and the UN serves as a major patronage machine for feminist employment. Their obsession with “gender equality and the empowerment of women” (their ubiquitous and contradictory phrase) involves them in fueling global poverty, ensuring that underdeveloped countries stay underdeveloped, indoctrinating children into feminist ideology, creating and exacerbating the global AIDS epidemic, undermining constructive “liberation” efforts of oppressed peoples, even encouraging war, and more. I spend over a hundred pages on this in my book, The New Politics of Sex (www.StephenBaskerville.com), and I quote numerous testimonies of scholars, journalists, and practitioners who have first-hand experience battling feminists at the UN.
More UN conferences have been devoted to “women” than any other topic. These conferences and other meetings are organized by feminist organizations, who draft the final document before the conference begins. Groups disapproved by feminists are inhibited and excluded from participation. Feminist groups participate sitting around the conference table while official UN ambassadors from poor countries (upholding traditional values) must stand against the wall. They hold multiple meetings simultaneously in different languages, so that poor countries, lacking the staff and translators, cannot participate.
UN “human rights” treaties like CEDAW and the Convention on the Rights of the Child are written and enforced by feminist groups. UN “human rights” agencies constantly push to make abortion a human right, despite the contrary wishes of most member states. They also push to make domestic violence a human rights violation, which will allow or force governments to treat men accused of domestic violence like dictators, removing their due process protections.
UNICEF is especially saturated with feminism. The agency some of us remember from the 1960s, with Danny Kaye selling Easter Seals, has become the directorate of global social work and viciously anti-male.
UN “development aid” goes entirely to women, making it global welfare with all the familiar consequences: eliminating fathers, preventing family formation, and trapping poor countries in the poverty and accompanying social ills that always result from widespread single motherhood.
UN-sponsored “sex education” programs do not just instruct children in how to have sex; they also indoctrinate them into feminist ideology.
UN AIDS programs made the AIDS epidemic far worse, especially among heterosexuals in places like Africa, by undermining effective abstinence programs and pushing condoms exclusively.
UN programs against “child soldiers” have zero impact, because they are undermined by UN ideology itself, which encourages children to rebel and break free from their parents and join gangs and militias.
UN programs on “human trafficking” encourage various destructive practices and augment government power. They make prostitution a crime for the men to buy (“sex trafficking”) but legal for the women to sell (“sex workers”).
The International Criminal Court, formally linked to the UN, spends most of its time prosecuting men for alleged sexual crimes.
The UN’s most basic role – ensuring global peace – is undermined by encouraging military intervention in places like Afghanistan to promote “gender equality”.
I could go on and on, and you will find all these points and others elaborated in Part Four of my book, The New Politics of Sex (www.StephenBaskerville.com).
A free house,money, education and our health resources. Then, to bring their large extended families here too. Admittedly about 3% will make it big here. And I'll be the first to applaud them. But the remaining approx 95% will be a drain on us forever. Already the earlier batch of them are now a burden on our council tax. So we ordinary people,most of whom don't want them here,are having to pay for them!! Totally insane. They can also rely on traitorous hypocritical “ human rights” lawyers to fight hard against deportation. And crazed utopian dreamer Liberals too. So we have an enemy within to defeat as well. No wonder they see us as the world's suckers.
>“Do you know what it means to be “redpilled”? It’s the belief that society favors women over men—a view that fuels harmful gender narratives. “Red pill” narratives are central to the #manosphere and challenges progress on #GenderEquality.”
I think I can write a booklet about this UN women tweet but lets focus on 1 thing.
Lets assume I agree with this statement (It is close but absolutely no cigar) "It’s [redpilled] the belief that society favors women over men"
UN WOMEN concludes that this is "a view that fuels harmful gender narratives". (No proof though)
Now look at feminism:
Feminism fights for equal rights (for women) to men, against the patriarchy that -as to feminists- oppressed women through all of history ...
I think it is safe to conclude that: Feminism is the belief that society favors men over women
So by their own reasoning: feminism is a view that fuels harmful gender narratives. (and challenges progress on #GenderEquality)
With which I strangely enough agree.
I just started reading and clicked the link to the quote “fuel faster momentum toward women’s empowerment.”
However the link doesn't contain the quote (UN women may have changed it)
A google search didn't reveal the exact quote but the sentiment is there for sure.
Given the fact that I expect you will be attacked I wanted to point this out.
Great work, thanks for doing this.
I'm back to reading.
Thanks for your concern. The quote comes from the report (pdf file) that is available at the link/website.
Found it 👍
This shows why you are a phd and I'm not.
1.
aha. I see it now.. the not so subtle way of pushing 'females' to the front while acknowledging everyone else. I've known about it but now I see this behaviour (gaslighting??) for what it is. Interesting..
" “Everyone should feel safe at home. Yet, every day women and girls are killed by an intimate partner or someone in their own family. Governments must invest in the prevention of gender-based violence and support services for survivors.”"
so does that mean that (according to the UN) the One Male and Two Females in the following case should have the right 'to feel safe at home'??
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdezzxnn7kjo
While it is propaganda 'every day women and girls....' this woman killed two women..
I sent UN Women, Germany an email pointing out how unsafe the 1 man and 2 women were in a females house..