The rhetoric is very soft. The fact that gynocentrism is used for men's issues, is nothing short of female supremacy, hatred, and virulent borderline genocidal misandry.
It should be extremely obvious that men's health should be an ends to itself.
Merely stating that it's "the best means of helping men" is rhetorically soft and unassertive that it is frustrating to read.
Good piece, but some critiques.
The rhetoric is very soft. The fact that gynocentrism is used for men's issues, is nothing short of female supremacy, hatred, and virulent borderline genocidal misandry.
It should be extremely obvious that men's health should be an ends to itself.
Merely stating that it's "the best means of helping men" is rhetorically soft and unassertive that it is frustrating to read.
But yes, the idea of the piece is correct.