I've very rarely seen women openly act out in the work place - only once or twice.
However, at home, and in public with their significant other you can see women acting out every day.
Just walk about residential areas, through parks, and tourist or leisure areas.
I think we need to start openly discussing gynocentism, gynocracy, female psychology, shit testing, emotional reasoning, and the effects of novellas on women.
Violence on men is nullified by a female first ideology. Family court (his wallet, her choice) is a war zone with thousands of cases heard daily in just the USA. A quarter of a million (my body my choice) health care abortions per day globally.
We need to consider more than just women's expressed and immediate concerns. Women's animus possessed policies are killing civilization with a minus 20% per generation replacement rate in the USA today.
Great stuff yet again James! Gynocentrism runs silent and it runs deep.
Fascinating idea that a part of men's lower life expectancy could be due to their being more likely to die from violence. I wonder how that might be factored in?
Would it be possible to calculate the community member package value?
Like salary packaging. As men or as women what is the package value. There might be a wages gap in favour of men, and demand that that gap be closed, however the health budget gap in favour of women does not appear to attract the same interest.
Would the value of, for example, women’s wages + their share of health budget etc be of greater or lessor value than the value of men’s wages + their share of community benefit like health budget?
Could this then be used to justify an increase to the wage gap as men have to pay for their own health care. If men earn more then we pay more tax. If we do not have genuine say in how that is spent, should we be paying? If the wage gap is to be closed then we should receive a more equitable share of the community benefits.
No taxation without genuine representation. Haven’t there been revolutions over this issue?
I was mulling the idea over a little myself as my local government had decided to create a build to rent to buy program for single women 25-45 on low to moderate incomes with little or no deposit. They will have the option to purchase after 10 years.
I started to think about the value of that program, plus health budget + various other things. Surely men 25-45 on low incomes also need support. Why the ageism?
There are so many things, I’m not sure how to calculate. In simplest terms I imagine the health budget divided by population of women then added to wage figure. I imagine the government knows, but…
Thanks, James, I will write to DOGE about that, too
Why do women act out in the home?
I've very rarely seen women openly act out in the work place - only once or twice.
However, at home, and in public with their significant other you can see women acting out every day.
Just walk about residential areas, through parks, and tourist or leisure areas.
I think we need to start openly discussing gynocentism, gynocracy, female psychology, shit testing, emotional reasoning, and the effects of novellas on women.
Violence on men is nullified by a female first ideology. Family court (his wallet, her choice) is a war zone with thousands of cases heard daily in just the USA. A quarter of a million (my body my choice) health care abortions per day globally.
We need to consider more than just women's expressed and immediate concerns. Women's animus possessed policies are killing civilization with a minus 20% per generation replacement rate in the USA today.
Women, by their nature, are political animals....meaning that they are gregarious. Hence they
acquire power which they able to exert in society.
RE funding for women's issues. These are the same left wing agitators that advocates equality.
That absurd level of funding is really about buying votes.
Thanks for your article James.
Great stuff yet again James! Gynocentrism runs silent and it runs deep.
Fascinating idea that a part of men's lower life expectancy could be due to their being more likely to die from violence. I wonder how that might be factored in?
Factor that in with the suicide rate for men as compared to women.
Would it be possible to calculate the community member package value?
Like salary packaging. As men or as women what is the package value. There might be a wages gap in favour of men, and demand that that gap be closed, however the health budget gap in favour of women does not appear to attract the same interest.
Would the value of, for example, women’s wages + their share of health budget etc be of greater or lessor value than the value of men’s wages + their share of community benefit like health budget?
Could this then be used to justify an increase to the wage gap as men have to pay for their own health care. If men earn more then we pay more tax. If we do not have genuine say in how that is spent, should we be paying? If the wage gap is to be closed then we should receive a more equitable share of the community benefits.
No taxation without genuine representation. Haven’t there been revolutions over this issue?
I understand the general idea that you are putting forward, and I think it is an interesting one. I will give it some more thought. Thanks.
Thanks James.
I was mulling the idea over a little myself as my local government had decided to create a build to rent to buy program for single women 25-45 on low to moderate incomes with little or no deposit. They will have the option to purchase after 10 years.
I started to think about the value of that program, plus health budget + various other things. Surely men 25-45 on low incomes also need support. Why the ageism?
There are so many things, I’m not sure how to calculate. In simplest terms I imagine the health budget divided by population of women then added to wage figure. I imagine the government knows, but…