Interesting that the 3 "professors" comprise a male "identifying" as a female, 2 "professors" of kinesiology, 2 are from Canada and 1 from Columbia University.
It would appear that the scientific method does not feature strongly in their disciplines or institutions.
Congratulations for being mentioned to the supreme court.
Even though they misrepresent you; they considered you to be a big enough fish to mention.
Even though I always knew that the fight for the truth is a fight forever; I had never expected the fight for the truth would be about such common sense thing as "boys are stronger than girls".
Amazing Jim. Were they thinking they could just write it off and no one would blink? Are you in touch with the opposing lawyers? I bet they would be happy to hear from you.
I’m not in touch with any of the lawyers in the case. I shared the post on X, and I suspect this will result in interested persons sharing the post with the lawyers.
James, I do not know how you are still standing but you are.
Anyone reading your posts, and with their head screwed on the right way, would have to think 'there is something wrong here'..
A friend of mine who is a professor has told me the horror stories (in Germany and Switzerland) of 'climbing the stairs to a career' and whilst he has escaped the nasties, he has seen and heard of such people who will do anything to prove they are right or deserve better than anyone else... It is almost like some of these people enter Universities to get the 'affirmation' they didn't get as a child (my point of view).
You’re kind to call the trio of professors’ comments on your research “misrepresentations.” Their comments are twisted and subversive; have they no shame?! Reading this raised my cortisol levels. I want to break something.
Disappointing but totally unsurprisingly. Facts and true scientific objectivity nowadays unfortunately practically always loses to ideology. And nowhere is that more so than in debates involving “gender identity” and “climate change “. These have acquired the fanaticism often associated with religious zealots who tolerate no opposing beliefs.
Great defense of your meta-analyses James.
Interesting that the 3 "professors" comprise a male "identifying" as a female, 2 "professors" of kinesiology, 2 are from Canada and 1 from Columbia University.
It would appear that the scientific method does not feature strongly in their disciplines or institutions.
Thanks, Gareth.
Congratulations for being mentioned to the supreme court.
Even though they misrepresent you; they considered you to be a big enough fish to mention.
Even though I always knew that the fight for the truth is a fight forever; I had never expected the fight for the truth would be about such common sense thing as "boys are stronger than girls".
And look where we are.
Congratulations and keep up the fight.
Amazing Jim. Were they thinking they could just write it off and no one would blink? Are you in touch with the opposing lawyers? I bet they would be happy to hear from you.
I’m not in touch with any of the lawyers in the case. I shared the post on X, and I suspect this will result in interested persons sharing the post with the lawyers.
James, I do not know how you are still standing but you are.
Anyone reading your posts, and with their head screwed on the right way, would have to think 'there is something wrong here'..
A friend of mine who is a professor has told me the horror stories (in Germany and Switzerland) of 'climbing the stairs to a career' and whilst he has escaped the nasties, he has seen and heard of such people who will do anything to prove they are right or deserve better than anyone else... It is almost like some of these people enter Universities to get the 'affirmation' they didn't get as a child (my point of view).
Yes, there are many things wrong in academia.
Unfortunately, James Nuzzo is pretty much a misogynist in most areas.
You’re kind to call the trio of professors’ comments on your research “misrepresentations.” Their comments are twisted and subversive; have they no shame?! Reading this raised my cortisol levels. I want to break something.
Disappointing but totally unsurprisingly. Facts and true scientific objectivity nowadays unfortunately practically always loses to ideology. And nowhere is that more so than in debates involving “gender identity” and “climate change “. These have acquired the fanaticism often associated with religious zealots who tolerate no opposing beliefs.