Sometimes I wonder whether the people creating these reports experience the cognitive dissonance of their certainty of their own moral goodness vs. the craven immorality required to produce them.
If so, this dissonance cannot be present in a happy, or content, person, despite their certainty; and if not, they must live such confused lives, lacking any meaningful understanding of the world around them, that they wouldn’t know what happiness even is.
By contrast, our Dr. Nuzzo demonstrates on a weekly -or daily- basis here on his Substack that living the values of scientific rigor and integrity is its own reward. The only sad part is that these values are so rare among those in the same field.
Bravo Jim! Thanks for assembling this misandry so clearly for all to see. It reminds me of the domestic violence research where they would include males in the surveys but never admit to their victimhood. At least they printed some of the male data in their charts and those like you, were able to call out their shenanigans. Now it is worse since they don't even publish the males perspectives. Crazy indeed?
Male violence against women is generally reactive.
Anyone who denies this, study all interactions in the homes across all places and times.
Or use basic logic, if she attacks him, he has no right to self defense because she's smaller. Yet, she can murder and use the PMS defence or the battered woman defence. And false allegations are a silver bullet to system abuse of men.
I was brainwashed as a child to believe that men should never use violence against women, but to their credit women convinced me otherwise. The threat of physical violence was an important check on female relational aggression that has largely been removed.
Women's groups seem bent on demonstrating why female journalists should receive online criticism. Often quite severe considering the indoctrinated stupidity they usually espouse.
In fact, if you examine the value system of the left brain (which is oestrogen sensitive : Prof Iain McGilchrist, 'The Master & His Emissary', page 33), you'll find that UTILITY is its main concern, not the truth, beauty, and 'something beyond oneself' valued by the right brain.
A brilliant forensic dissection and a persuasive argument to defund UN Women and any organisation supporting it. I used to work in international development so I don't advocate for defunding any multilateral institution lightly. The world needs multilateral institutions more than ever, but not if they are cesspits of hate, which UN Women evidently is.
And this is why the UN needs to be defunded.
They are simply taxpayer funded activists.
You only have to look at the UN women X posts to realise how fundamentally flawed everything they say is, it drives me nuts
Sometimes I wonder whether the people creating these reports experience the cognitive dissonance of their certainty of their own moral goodness vs. the craven immorality required to produce them.
If so, this dissonance cannot be present in a happy, or content, person, despite their certainty; and if not, they must live such confused lives, lacking any meaningful understanding of the world around them, that they wouldn’t know what happiness even is.
By contrast, our Dr. Nuzzo demonstrates on a weekly -or daily- basis here on his Substack that living the values of scientific rigor and integrity is its own reward. The only sad part is that these values are so rare among those in the same field.
No, the people producing these reports are so sure of themselves.
https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-the-left-brains-wilful-denial/
The left brain hemisphere runs on dopamine, and is oestrogen dependent. In fact, dopamine receptors atrophy and die in the absence of oestrogen.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/12/001204072446.htm#:~:text=Eugene%20Redmond%2C%20Jr.%2C%20professor,Neural%20Transplantation%20and%20Regeneration%20Program.&text=FULL%20STORY-,Estrogen%20deprivation%20leads%20to%20the%20death%20of%20dopamine%20cells%20in,implications%20for%20post%2Dmenopausal%20women
Bravo Jim! Thanks for assembling this misandry so clearly for all to see. It reminds me of the domestic violence research where they would include males in the surveys but never admit to their victimhood. At least they printed some of the male data in their charts and those like you, were able to call out their shenanigans. Now it is worse since they don't even publish the males perspectives. Crazy indeed?
The UN should GTFO with "online violence". What a bunch of bullshit. Oh watch out, someone said mean words to someone online. OMG what will we do.
Male violence against women is generally reactive.
Anyone who denies this, study all interactions in the homes across all places and times.
Or use basic logic, if she attacks him, he has no right to self defense because she's smaller. Yet, she can murder and use the PMS defence or the battered woman defence. And false allegations are a silver bullet to system abuse of men.
And take off the gamma bias goggles.
I was brainwashed as a child to believe that men should never use violence against women, but to their credit women convinced me otherwise. The threat of physical violence was an important check on female relational aggression that has largely been removed.
Children require a minimum amount of corporal punishment to discipline them.
We owe them this to ensure they are trained to not FAFO in later life.
Women are the same, except they do not mature.
https://youtu.be/AgJy5S-m4tY?si=sKrFcKzRobI2kmG9
@ 9:55 ~ There's the 'bird hands'... 😳 "Go! Run! Get to the chopper!" 😬
Women's groups seem bent on demonstrating why female journalists should receive online criticism. Often quite severe considering the indoctrinated stupidity they usually espouse.
Oh, oh.... a 'scholarly harassment' rap will be coming your way.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-023-00191-y
LOL. Good thing I live in the US where we have a modicum of free speech. females have already created tyranny
Indeed, if you spout hate then you are not entitled to safety.
Safety from consequences breeds delusion. Restore reality testing. Self defence or death, in the spirit of 1776.
Adherence to truth has never been part of the feminist MO. Just 'strategic theory'. Inconvenient facts may be safely discarded in this value system.
https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
In fact, if you examine the value system of the left brain (which is oestrogen sensitive : Prof Iain McGilchrist, 'The Master & His Emissary', page 33), you'll find that UTILITY is its main concern, not the truth, beauty, and 'something beyond oneself' valued by the right brain.
https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/
A brilliant forensic dissection and a persuasive argument to defund UN Women and any organisation supporting it. I used to work in international development so I don't advocate for defunding any multilateral institution lightly. The world needs multilateral institutions more than ever, but not if they are cesspits of hate, which UN Women evidently is.