Excellent work showcasing the UN's anti-male bias in front of a huge audience of readers. That's how you do it, so the UN can't sweep justified criticism of its biases under the rug.
The idea that men are disposable is so deeply ingrained into our culture that UN Women’s comments would typically go unnoticed.
It is a forgone conclusion almost exclusively men would be carrying out the most dangerous and difficult rescues likewise is completely and ironically ignored.
This is a worse than worthless organization that most certainly should not be receiving government handouts.
Their ideology forces others to bow down to them and therefore they are slave traders.
This idea that is now in my head and I think I see other groups doing the same thing. All in the name of 'rights'; are one set of people FORCING others to provide. This is a form of slavery.
Tax is slavery.
Ayn Rand [101] [Galt’s Speech,]: The basic political principle of the Objectivist ethics is: no man may initiate the use of physical force against others. No man—or group or society or government—has the right to assume the role of a criminal and initiate the use of physical compulsion against any man. Men have the right to use physical force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use. The ethical principle involved is simple and clear-cut: it is the difference between murder and self-defense. A holdup man seeks to gain a value, wealth, by killing his victim; the victim does not grow richer by killing a holdup man. The principle is: no man may obtain any values from others by resorting to physical force.
My goodness! U. N. Women just encountered a backlash against their open gender inequality and lack of ethics. Couldn't have happened to more deserving folks.
Your article shows us how important it is to know the reality that is sometimes missed because of the contagion that has taken over our thinking and you point us to seeing this 'tiny/huge' piece of reality by shining a light onto something that is missed.
I wonder how that would work. I'm a rescuer who found somebody under tons of broken concrete. When I discover it's a man I say sorry buddy but I must leave you here. I must find a female to rescue first.
It is not surprising. Their name is UN "Women", and there's no UN Men (discrimination since the beginning, so we know that brings money to them). All the shit that UN Women comments on X is founded on the ideological principle that "women have it worse". They receive so much money for the things they say, so the incentives for them didn't change at all. And I don't think that the majority of the money goes to women in need, so the reward for discrimination goes mostly to UN workers.
Excellent work showcasing the UN's anti-male bias in front of a huge audience of readers. That's how you do it, so the UN can't sweep justified criticism of its biases under the rug.
The idea that men are disposable is so deeply ingrained into our culture that UN Women’s comments would typically go unnoticed.
It is a forgone conclusion almost exclusively men would be carrying out the most dangerous and difficult rescues likewise is completely and ironically ignored.
This is a worse than worthless organization that most certainly should not be receiving government handouts.
I greatly begrudge paying tax as I know some of it gets directed to this awful organtisation. They need to be defunded.
feminists are slave traders.
Their ideology forces others to bow down to them and therefore they are slave traders.
This idea that is now in my head and I think I see other groups doing the same thing. All in the name of 'rights'; are one set of people FORCING others to provide. This is a form of slavery.
Tax is slavery.
Ayn Rand [101] [Galt’s Speech,]: The basic political principle of the Objectivist ethics is: no man may initiate the use of physical force against others. No man—or group or society or government—has the right to assume the role of a criminal and initiate the use of physical compulsion against any man. Men have the right to use physical force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use. The ethical principle involved is simple and clear-cut: it is the difference between murder and self-defense. A holdup man seeks to gain a value, wealth, by killing his victim; the victim does not grow richer by killing a holdup man. The principle is: no man may obtain any values from others by resorting to physical force.
https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/physical_force.html
I've become so used to posts like UN Women, that I doubt I would have noticed it's tone or intention if you had not brought my attention to it.
Bravo Jim! nearly 300k is great news. Well done.
Exceptional work James, well done... Regards, David Maywald
My goodness! U. N. Women just encountered a backlash against their open gender inequality and lack of ethics. Couldn't have happened to more deserving folks.
Thank you so much James!
Your article shows us how important it is to know the reality that is sometimes missed because of the contagion that has taken over our thinking and you point us to seeing this 'tiny/huge' piece of reality by shining a light onto something that is missed.
I wonder how that would work. I'm a rescuer who found somebody under tons of broken concrete. When I discover it's a man I say sorry buddy but I must leave you here. I must find a female to rescue first.
UN WOMEN is basically a bunch of man hating witches funded by mens taxes.
It is not surprising. Their name is UN "Women", and there's no UN Men (discrimination since the beginning, so we know that brings money to them). All the shit that UN Women comments on X is founded on the ideological principle that "women have it worse". They receive so much money for the things they say, so the incentives for them didn't change at all. And I don't think that the majority of the money goes to women in need, so the reward for discrimination goes mostly to UN workers.
Added to my short article making the case that feminism is anti-equality: https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQuAIW2_Mx2JXv2_kqe3IkVo5uAr9sNKZOvobFG1PH6hDUvdUauQp0wv_gWuctrHA9jcFlH012t7gSO/pub
I'd like to see all the UN harpies at the bottom of an earthquake. The world would be an infinitely better place.
Strangely enough I had only seen your post while I follow 6 of them.
This is probably related to add revenue for X from UN as I see these unwanted UN tweets in burst from time to time.