Jim, you're a global treasure. New project idea: use A.I. to iterate over feminist science publications to find one scoring the highest in illogic, gamma bias, or statistical fraud. Then publish a paper about it, citing it. Creating a paper mill that blows away the dross, back out the door of science.
I have observed that modern feminist and critical theory-based academic papers follow similar patterns in how they are written. Most of them use the same template, but it’s intellectually different than the templates that scientists use in describing their experiments (for purposes of clarity). I believe James Lindsay also picked up on all of this when he was doing his work in this area. I believe AI could help in identifying these patterns/templates across large numbers of papers. However, I think this can also be done without AI.
I have observed that modern feminist and critical theory-based academic papers follow similar patterns in how they are written. Most of them use the same template, but it’s intellectually different than the templates that scientists use in describing their experiments (for purposes of clarity). I believe James Lindsay also picked up on all of this when he was doing his work in this area. I believe AI could help in identifying these patterns/templates across large numbers of papers. However, I think this can also be done without AI.
Thank you, James. One thing I would like to add to this mix is that I think men should avoid female doctors to the greatest extent possible, as Dr. Spier is the only female physician I have seen that expresses concern for the welfare of men. There is a never-ending stream of female doctors on here only expressing concern for women and female health issues.
I agree. Female doctors are consistently the worst. I've had lots of damage from a female dentist. The women resent the fact that they need to work as doctors. They take out their jealousy and anger on their patients.
Thaks Jim - Packed as usual! Lots to peruse. Congrats on the National Review!
Thanks, Tom.
Jim, you're a global treasure. New project idea: use A.I. to iterate over feminist science publications to find one scoring the highest in illogic, gamma bias, or statistical fraud. Then publish a paper about it, citing it. Creating a paper mill that blows away the dross, back out the door of science.
RE: potential use of AI
I have observed that modern feminist and critical theory-based academic papers follow similar patterns in how they are written. Most of them use the same template, but it’s intellectually different than the templates that scientists use in describing their experiments (for purposes of clarity). I believe James Lindsay also picked up on all of this when he was doing his work in this area. I believe AI could help in identifying these patterns/templates across large numbers of papers. However, I think this can also be done without AI.
RE: potential use of AI
I have observed that modern feminist and critical theory-based academic papers follow similar patterns in how they are written. Most of them use the same template, but it’s intellectually different than the templates that scientists use in describing their experiments (for purposes of clarity). I believe James Lindsay also picked up on all of this when he was doing his work in this area. I believe AI could help in identifying these patterns/templates across large numbers of papers. However, I think this can also be done without AI.
Thank you, James. One thing I would like to add to this mix is that I think men should avoid female doctors to the greatest extent possible, as Dr. Spier is the only female physician I have seen that expresses concern for the welfare of men. There is a never-ending stream of female doctors on here only expressing concern for women and female health issues.
I agree. Female doctors are consistently the worst. I've had lots of damage from a female dentist. The women resent the fact that they need to work as doctors. They take out their jealousy and anger on their patients.
Good observation, thank you. I hope your teeth are better now.