Thanks, James. The Democrats are not only demonizing masculinity, they are demonizing men as well. Funding women's health, while ignoring men's health, is a good example of that.
They could have taken $1 million to conduct a survey of thousands of men. Then, based on the results, they could have invested the remaining $19 million into some of the things that the men might have said in the survey would help them.
If you can read the Telegraph today The Snitch… NSW DPP again criticised by a judge for lack of factual evidence in a rape case. Dropped & costs awarded to the accused
I think that is the excuse to justify their dereliction. They fear criticism for not charging or prosecuting.
Then there is the cases where they won’t stop prosecuting… was it Jarryd Haynes? The dpp appealed appeals and then re prosecuted. Something like 3-4 times.
So good that it was dropped. Usually they would take it on the chin and continue.
I think many cases are simply pushed through by police without proper investigation, and the dpp without genuine consideration to “let the court decide”.
That’s were the prevailing community bias and indoctrination comes into play…
As an example, it sets the parity ratio for female to male life expectancy at 1.06, “given women's longer life expectancy.” So any country where women outlive men by only 5% has a “gap” that must be resolved by women living longer, men dying earlier, or both.
It goes on to complain that even though woman have higher life expectancies and more years of healthy life than men in almost all nations, the ratio of healthy to total years has increased for men relative to women in recent years.
In other words, the report’s parity goals require more men to die, and also more of the remaining men to suffer, as compared to current gender outcomes - even though men are already well behind women on both measures!
Yes, here is the full quote from the WEF's Global Gender Gap Report, which shows that the way that they determine "parity" in male and female life expectancy is rigged from the start: "in the case of healthy life expectancy the equality benchmark is set at 1.06 to capture that fact that women tend to naturally live longer than men. As such, parity is considered as achieved if, on average, women live five years longer than men."
Thanks, James. The Democrats are not only demonizing masculinity, they are demonizing men as well. Funding women's health, while ignoring men's health, is a good example of that.
And then spending 20 million to make it look like they care!
They could have taken $1 million to conduct a survey of thousands of men. Then, based on the results, they could have invested the remaining $19 million into some of the things that the men might have said in the survey would help them.
Lots of good stuff as usual Jim. Thanks! and thanks for the plug!
If you can read the Telegraph today The Snitch… NSW DPP again criticised by a judge for lack of factual evidence in a rape case. Dropped & costs awarded to the accused
Yes… in the public interest… whatever that means
I think that is the excuse to justify their dereliction. They fear criticism for not charging or prosecuting.
Then there is the cases where they won’t stop prosecuting… was it Jarryd Haynes? The dpp appealed appeals and then re prosecuted. Something like 3-4 times.
Exactly
So good that it was dropped. Usually they would take it on the chin and continue.
I think many cases are simply pushed through by police without proper investigation, and the dpp without genuine consideration to “let the court decide”.
That’s were the prevailing community bias and indoctrination comes into play…
The Global Gender Gap report is an abomination.
As an example, it sets the parity ratio for female to male life expectancy at 1.06, “given women's longer life expectancy.” So any country where women outlive men by only 5% has a “gap” that must be resolved by women living longer, men dying earlier, or both.
It goes on to complain that even though woman have higher life expectancies and more years of healthy life than men in almost all nations, the ratio of healthy to total years has increased for men relative to women in recent years.
In other words, the report’s parity goals require more men to die, and also more of the remaining men to suffer, as compared to current gender outcomes - even though men are already well behind women on both measures!
Yes, here is the full quote from the WEF's Global Gender Gap Report, which shows that the way that they determine "parity" in male and female life expectancy is rigged from the start: "in the case of healthy life expectancy the equality benchmark is set at 1.06 to capture that fact that women tend to naturally live longer than men. As such, parity is considered as achieved if, on average, women live five years longer than men."